Garlic wrapping encrypting multiple messages does happen on all I2P routers, but the other two the consensus is pretty much that those are problems which are either better solved at the application layer(I'll explain what I mean soon) or better solved by improving obfuscation techniques. That said, not having official exits means we only have in-network content which, as they say, is king. It's not cut-and-dry, and probably best to consider them as having different use-cases. I2P is able to do many things Tor can't, but Tor is also able to make more conservative choices about how it's network is structured to deal with things like sybil attacks differently than we can. Who is primarily in charge of the project these days? Any organizations, or mostly anons? Would you say the project is healthy? What is the difference between the two transports (NTCP2 and SSU) and do I want both?Ĭan you explain what SAM is, very high level? I noticed that bitcoind wants it, for example. It seems "Streams" are just a higher level protocol abstraction for real time / high volume tunnels? Think "websockets"? Is there a way to see what each destination is for (e.g., the locally mapped port)? It can be guessed by looking at the open tunnels, but wondering if there's a better way.
I understand those are the permanent addresses used by others to open incoming tunnels. In i2pd, I can see all local destinations listed in the web interface. Given tunnels are unidirectional, what is the protocol to establish a bidirectional connection between client and server? (I the client opens a tunnel and the server responds by opening a tunnel back?)
What are Incoming/Outgoing "Tags"? Also, if I click "Tags" in the i2pd web interface, it shows me an "Amount" next to a destination address. Have any of these been implemented and in which project? This comparison from 2016 shows 3 really cool features from the backlog at the very bottom. Just because the project distances itself from exit nodes (probably legal reasons)? ), how come it is less popular? Also, it is not funded by the US government. I2P seems to be more powerful than Tor (e.g., packet switching, load balancing.
I've seen i2p destinations (`2p`) with port `0`. How do I know which of the services listed in the web interfaces I should enable: BOB, SAM, I2CP, I2PControl? It seems each application requires a different one? So by default I turn off all of them until I truly need one?Īre there any ports that must be forwarded for the enabled services to work properly? It seems it's all optional, so what are the benefits in practice? is this an outdated statement? The main Java implementation's website says "since summer 2016 it fully implements all I2P APIs". I've heard the Java implementation (i2p) is more powerful than the C++ one (i2pd).
0 kommentar(er)
